Search

07 Sept 2025

High Court dispute over Laois garage where exotic pets including an alligator are kept

Tarantulas, chameleons and scorpions kept in Portarlington garage

High Court dispute over Laois garage where exotic pets including an alligator are kept

A caiman alligator. Pic: Wikipedia

A couple have launched High Court proceedings against a developer and its principals due to a dispute about the ownership of a garage where exotic pets including scorpions, chameleons, and an alligator are kept. 

Alan O Neill, and his partner June Finnegan from Crann Nua, Edenderry Road, Portarlington, have sued Drumgoan Developments Limited, Noel Martin Senior and Darren Martin, who are alleged to be the firm's owners and operators.  

The couple claim that the defendants, who have asserted they own the garage adjacent to the couple's home of 20 years, have threatened them and damaged the disputed property with a JCB.

The couple claim they purchased their home and for an additional fee the garage in the Crann Nua estate, which was built by Drumgoan, in 2005.

Despite paying for it, the couple say the garage does not appear to have been properly conveyed to them, due to an oversight by their former solicitor. 

The garage, they accept, is on land that since 2023 is registered to Drumgoan. 

The couple were unaware of the issue until recent months.

The couple claim the defendants have engaged in a "land grab" and have made demands of them and their neighbours who also have garages in the estate for money.

In a sworn statement to the court Mr O'Neill said that on 21st of February last he heard "a loud hammering on the wall of the garage, and found two men smashing the walls of the garage with power tools." 

Another man arrived in a JCB and said he intended to drive it through the wall, despite being informed that the plaintiff's had pets in the garage. 

He said he was also given a piece of paper that said the defendants owned the garage, and that the men were directed by Mr Darren Martin. 

After the JCB drove through the garage, causing substantial damage to the property, Mr O'Neill called the gardai. 

While the officers told the men to leave the scene, he says the Gardai said they could not get involved as it was a civil matter, he said. 

The couple say that for 20 years they have used the garage to keep and breed pets including various reptiles, including chameleons and a female caiman alligator. They also keep tarantulas and scorpions in the garage.
They have insulated the garage and expended sums to keep it at a certain temperature.

As a result of the damage done to the property, Mr O'Neill said many of the animals have been moved, and it is unlikely that they will breed this year.

Mr O'Neill also said in his sworn statement that Mr Noel Martin Snr sent his family a significant number of threats, which the plaintiff says are designed to intimidate his family into acquieseiing with the defendant's scheme. 
He also claims that the defendants have been driving their vehicles near his home, "for no particular reason other than to intimidate" the plaintiff's family. 

When Mr O'Neill's solicitor sent a cease and desist letter to the defendants Mr Martin Snr replied that the solicitors letter was "waffle", that the animals "belonged in a zoo" and threatened to report the plaintiffs to Tusla. 
Seeking the injunction Ruaidhri Giblin Bl, instructed by solicitor Paul Kelly for the couple said it is his client's case that any purported claim the defendants are making over the garage "should be made through a solicitor." 

Counsel said his client is entitled to orders to protect the property and restrain the defendant and his agents from interfering with the plaintiffs' enjoyment of their property.  
The matter came before Mr Justice Mark Sanfey on Wednesday, who on an ex parte basis granted the couple a temporary injunction restraining the defendants or their servants and agents from contacting or communicating with the plaintiffs. 

The judge said that he was also prepared to grant the couple permission to serve short notice of the proceedings, where they seek other orders against the defendants.

The judge said that while he had only heard from one side in the dispute the communications from the defendants "did not put them in a good light".

The matter will return before the court next week.

To continue reading this article,
please subscribe and support local journalism!


Subscribing will allow you access to all of our premium content and archived articles.

Subscribe

To continue reading this article for FREE,
please kindly register and/or log in.


Registration is absolutely 100% FREE and will help us personalise your experience on our sites. You can also sign up to our carefully curated newsletter(s) to keep up to date with your latest local news!

Register / Login

Buy the e-paper of the Donegal Democrat, Donegal People's Press, Donegal Post and Inish Times here for instant access to Donegal's premier news titles.

Keep up with the latest news from Donegal with our daily newsletter featuring the most important stories of the day delivered to your inbox every evening at 5pm.