Doreen Lawrence tells of disbelief at claim police looked to ‘smear’ family

The mother of Stephen Lawrence has spoken of her disbelief at claims that undercover officers were tasked with finding information to “smear” and “destroy” her family.

Baroness Doreen Lawrence told the public inquiry into undercover policing on Thursday she had only wanted to be treated the same as any other family by police.

Her son Stephen was murdered by a racist gang of five or six attackers in south-east London in April 1993, only two of whom have been ever been brought to justice.

Incompetence and claims of corruption dogged the first failed investigation into his death, and in 2014 whistle-blower and former undercover officer Peter Francis claimed he had been tasked with gathering information to smear the Lawrence family.

This is denied by the Metropolitan Police.

Lady Lawrence said: “If they were able to put that amount of attention and resources into discrediting us as a family, if they’d put that amount of attention into seeking and to finding Stephen’s murderers, we would not be sitting here today.

“All the time during Stephen’s investigation all I wanted was to be treated the same. I wasn’t looking for special treatment.

“It is your job to investigate Stephen’s murder and that’s all I wanted.

“To have spent their time looking to smear and to find things to destroy us as a family, it’s hard to believe that people go to that extreme.”

She told the hearing that police assumed her family were criminals because they were black.

“Police officers were saying that they’d never met anybody like us before.

“And the assumption is that my son must have been a criminal, and that was what they kept bringing up. Because we were supposed to be so different.”

Lady Lawrence went on: “That was quite disturbing, because automatically you are put into a category that as blacks you are criminals, and there is nothing about me, my background, anything could ever give you that impression.”

She said the police did not seem interested in investigating her son’s murder and did not act on information passed on by them and people in the local community.

Lady Lawrence told the hearing: “If Stephen had been white they would have looked at it completely differently.”

Members of the public passed on names of suspects, which the Lawrences gave to the police, but no effective action was taken.

“The police did not want to know. People in authority did not want to know. Just another black boy has been murdered, so what? We were ignored. Constantly ignored,” she said.

Lady Lawrence added: “We had done everything that we could do to support the police, but in the end they did nothing to support us.”

She was shown a series of intelligence reports that made reference to the family’s justice campaign.

Some suggested that political groups wanted to influence the campaign while others were linked to plans for protests during the Macpherson Inquiry into Stephen’s death in 1998.

Outrage over the claims that Stephen Lawrence’s family had been spied on was one of the key catalysts for the mammoth Undercover Policing Inquiry, which began in 2015.

Whistleblower Mr Francis said that his bosses were racist, with one known as HN86 referring to black justice campaigners as monkeys, which the officer denies.

Mr Francis has also claimed: “The Special Branch attitude towards the Lawrence family was 100% racist.

“They were viewed as unable to think for themselves or come up with and run their campaign themselves.”

The UCPI is looking at the activities of undercover officers from the secretive Metropolitan Police units the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) and the National Public Order Intelligence Unit.

It is claimed that they deceived women into sexual relationships, including having children, used the identities of deceased children without their families’ permission, and spied on family justice campaigns.

The latest stage of the inquiry, that is looking at the SDS between 1993 and 2007, began in October.