Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai’s security trial

A Hong Kong court has heard final arguments in the landmark national security trial of former pro-democracy newspaper founder Jimmy Lai, who could be sentenced to up to life in prison if he is convicted.

Mr Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019.

He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications.

Mr Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical of Hong Kong’s government.

His high-profile case that has stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days, is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub.

It is unclear when a verdict will be delivered.

Prosecutor Anthony Chau on Monday discussed the security law concerning the collusion charges, arguing the request to impose sanctions must also include officials and not only states.

He planned to lay out other principle issues in the afternoon and make his closing statement Tuesday.

Earlier, prosecutors alleged Mr Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing “under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy”.

On the first day of his testimony, Mr Lai denied he had asked then-vice president Mike Pence and then-secretary of state Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests.

When Mr Lai’s lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the US government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Mr Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded.

But Mr Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020.

Closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Mr Lai’s health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Mr Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison.

The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first.

After Friday’s hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Mr Lai’s medical care.

It said a medical examination of Mr Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate.

When Mr Lai entered the courtroom, he waved and smiled to those sitting in the public gallery and briefly instructed his legal team in a voice audible to public attendees. He closed his eyes at times when the prosecution laid out its legal arguments.

The heart monitor was delivered to Mr Lai and he had no complaints about his health, Mr Chau said.

Mr Lai’s years-long detention in solidarity confinement has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups.

US president Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Mr Lai’s release: “I will get him out.”

In a Fox News radio interview in August, Mr Trump denied saying he would save Mr Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up.

“I’ve already brought it up, and I’m going to do everything I can to save him,” he said.

China has accused Mr Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs.

Dozens of people waited in the rain on Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Mr Lai.

Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Mr Lai’s health as he looked visibly thinner and she would continue to pray for him.

“I wanted to let him know we are still here,” she said.

When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city’s civil liberties for 50 years.

But critics say the promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city’s stability.