Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase

A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for 44 billion dollars (£33 billion).

But it absolved him of some fraud allegations, finding that he did not “scheme” to mislead investors.

The civil trial in San Francisco centred on a class-action lawsuit filed just before Mr Musk took control of Twitter, which he later renamed X.

Jurors were asked to decide if two tweets and comments Mr Musk made on a podcast in May 2022 amounted to him intentionally defrauding Twitter shareholders, who sold their shares based on Mr Musk’s statements.

The nine-person jury returned the verdict after three days of deliberation, nearly three weeks after the trial began on March 2.

They said that while Mr Musk was liable for misleading investors with two tweets — including one said the Twitter deal was “temporarily on hold”, he did not do so with a statement he made on a podcast and that he did not intentionally “scheme” to defraud investors.

Because it is a class action case, it is not clear what amount in damages Mr Musk will have to pay to thousands of shareholders, many of them institutional investors, but it is likely in the billions.

The jury awarded shareholders between about three to eight dollars per stock per day.

Mr Musk’s fortune is currently estimated at about 814 billion dollars (£610 billion), much of it tied up in Tesla shares.

“It’s an important victory, not just for investors of Twitter, but for the public markets,” said Joseph Cotchett, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.

“I think the jury’s verdict sends a strong message that just because you’re a rich and powerful person, you still have to obey the law, and no man is above the law.”

Mr Musk’s lawyers said they had no comment as they walked out of the courtroom.

Much of the trial focused on Mr Musk’s claims about the number of bots on Twitter.

Mr Musk testified that Twitter had a much higher number of fake and spam accounts than the 5% it disclosed in regulatory filings. He used what he called Twitter’s misrepresentation of the number of fake accounts on its service as a reason to retreat from the purchase.

After Mr Musk tried to back out, Twitter went to court in Delaware to force him to honour his original deal. Just before that case was scheduled to go to trial, Mr Musk reversed course again and agreed to pay what he had originally promised.